Summary

nz3g-9L3BrvGrC00qRKIQFuxSxNBTEp9w3qG_8tbrkaELVbsNBjZoA1ACziaChRw6jlU-CyEr_i7pMHEz7a88zSJAxKgRsSeU2VuuE6zVwBav5mpXA==
Edit Back

Properties

  • Meeting Date: Unknown
  • Meeting Type: 1x1
  • Note Type: Summary
  • Attendees: Scott Warner, Shiy

1. Meeting Summary

I spoke with Shiy about the potential for him to join Sustainer Systems North America in a role supporting Chris and the warehouse operation. The conversation was primarily a candid check-in on the opportunity, how I view the current state of Sustainer Systems, and what guardrails would need to be in place for the role to make sense for him.

My overall message was that Sustainer Systems had been in a fragile position previously, but Chris has materially stabilized and repositioned the business. I shared that there is no longer any serious concern about shutting it down, and while the company is behind where we would ideally want it to be, I believe Chris has done a strong job adapting the model for the US market and building the right partnerships. I also reinforced that Chris is trusted and that the organization generally supports him as he builds out the team.

We also talked through Shiy's concern that, if he returns, his role needs to be dedicated to Sustainer Systems only and not drift into general Festool or TTS work. I agreed that concern is valid and said we should consider formal language in the employment arrangement to make his reporting line and scope explicit. I noted that while I originally preferred warehouse-related roles under TTS because that keeps them within my operational purview, I would be comfortable structuring this differently for Shiy given the circumstances and the need for clear boundaries.

I was direct about the current staffing issue with Chad. Based on feedback from my team and Chris's view, Chad does not appear to be the right long-term fit for what Sustainer Systems needs operationally. I encouraged acting early rather than letting a poor fit linger and become harder to unwind later.

The other major open point is severance. Shiy asked whether accepting this role would terminate his severance, and I told him I need to review the agreement before giving a definitive answer. That may materially affect the compensation discussion he has with Chris. I also suggested that, depending on scope and capability, there may be a case to frame the role at a manager level rather than supervisor level.

2. Attendee List

  • Scott Warner
  • Shiy

3. Action Items

  • [Scott Warner] Review Shiy's severance agreement and determine whether accepting a role with Sustainer Systems or under TTS would terminate severance.
  • [Scott Warner] Consider employment structure options for Shiy, including direct Sustainer Systems employment versus TTS employment with a formal assignment to Sustainer Systems only.
  • [Scott Warner] If needed, coordinate with Lisa on drafting formal role language that limits Shiy's responsibilities to Sustainer Systems and avoids ad hoc support for Festool or other groups.
  • [Shiy] Continue compensation and role discussions with Chris.
  • [Shiy] Clarify with Chris that he wants the role to be Sustainer Systems only, with no spillover responsibilities into Festool or TTS operations.
  • [Shiy] Raise the possibility of a manager-level role with Chris as part of the job discussion.
  • [Scott Warner and Chris] Potentially align on offer structure and role scope if Chris wants me involved in the employment agreement.
  • [Scott Warner] Remain available to support the employment agreement process with Lisa if Shiy requests my involvement.

4. Relevant Timelines

  • No firm deadlines were established in the conversation.
  • Near term: I need to review the severance agreement before Shiy finalizes compensation discussions with Chris.
  • Near term: Role structure and reporting boundaries should be resolved as part of the offer and employment agreement process, before any start date.
  • Near term: If Chris decides to replace Chad, I reinforced that it would be better to make that change early rather than delay.

5. Additional Notes

  • My view is that Chris has been the key factor in stabilizing Sustainer Systems. The earlier leadership approach was not working, and the US business needed a different model than what was being imported from Europe.
  • I do not see Matt Howard as a meaningful blocker in this situation. My read is that he trusts Chris, and the stronger influence over Sustainer Systems direction remains with the European team.
  • Shiy remains cautious about reentering an environment where others could redirect his time. That concern is legitimate and should be addressed contractually or through formal reporting language.
  • I mentioned that I do the legal paperwork tied to these arrangements, which gives me a useful position to help shape the structure appropriately.
  • Separate side topic: Festool Academy still exists, but it does not currently have strong technical ownership. Shawn and I discussed that Garrett is not effectively managing it, but neither of us has bandwidth to solve that right now.
  • Lisa is now the HR director. She is workable, but she does not know the full historical context, so if I need to be involved in the offer process, that should be manageable.